Course ObjectiveApproximately 85% of perinatal mortality in the Netherlands is linked to
birth defects, premature birth, low birth weight and a poor start at
birth (Bonsel et al., 2010). The increasing number of interventions
during pregnancy and childbirth should increase good outcomes and
comfort of women during labor, but there is increasing evidence that
interventions are used more often than necessary. At this point of view,
supportive and preventive interventions that can improve outcomes are
often underexposed. Midwives should critically reflect on the
interventions that are frequently used (e.g. analgesia and augmentation
of labor, CTG monitoring, ultrasound) and should reflect on the quality
of maternity care in relation to these interventions. The focus will be
on the determinants of health and the promotion, monitoring and
optimizing of the physiology (support physiological birth).
1. Uses the knowledge of EBM, perinatal audits, clinical reasoning and
various instruments of risk judgment, for the care of obstetric risk
situations and uses this knowledge to contribute (improve/develop) to
2. Is able to explain and discuss structures governing the Dutch- and
other international healthcare systems, to be able to apply economic,
policy, organizational and management theories to analyze 'midwifery
care issues', from both societal and stakeholder perspectives.
3. Is able to explain the diagnostic value (reliability and validity) of
various diagnostic tests and is able to advice when to perform these
tests and is able to interpret the test results.
4. Applies knowledge of assessment, screening and clinical reasoning to
complex obstetric situations and case histories involving multifactor
problems, from a medical (somatic, psychological and functional),
socio-cultural, scientific and ethical perspective.
5. Masters scientific theories relating to patient safety and quality
assurance, including the effectiveness, efficiency and safety of several
triage systems and can apply and weigh up this knowledge in concrete
6. Is able to present orally and in writing specialized knowledge,
insights and scientific views underlying a complex midwifery care issue
to professionals in the field of maternity care, with the specific aims
of 1) translating it into evidence-based midwifery care policies,
guidelines and protocols; 2) promoting and monitoring evidence-based
midwifery care; or 3) the implementation of their own regional policies,
advices, guidelines and protocols in midwifery care.
Course ContentIn this module, themes are positioned around pregnant women with:
• IUGR (intrauterine growth retardation)
• Preterm birth
• Congenital anomalies
• Suboptimal start of the neonate (different increased risks resulting
in suboptimal neonatal start/low Apgar score)
The topics are offered with complex case histories from specific groups:
• Multiple problems, medical, social, psychological;
• Multiple caregivers involved;
• Medical ethically complex situations;
• Legality/Common Law/juris prediction, economic problems.
Teaching MethodsLectures on location: on average 7 hours per week.
Lectures (approximately 16 hours, workgroup 48 hours, individual study
104 hours) 6EC = 168 SBU.
Advanced Midwifery Science module is a part-time course of 8 weeks.
Total study time is 168 hours.
Method of AssessmentThe final grade is being determined by:
a theoretical Individual exam (40%);
4 scientific paper/written assignment (40 %);
oral presentation(s) (20%).
All exams need to be passed (minimum 6.0)
Entry RequirementsBachelor Midwifery plus premaster Health Sciences.
Blackburn, S. T. (2013). Maternal, Fetal, & Neonatal Physiology: A
Clinical Perspective (4th ed.).
Maryland Heights, MO: Elsevier Saunders.
A selection of literature will be made on the basis of lectures and
state of the art research.
Bonsel, G.J, Birnie, E, Denktaş, S, Steegers, E.A.P, & Poeran, V.J.J.
(2010). Lijnen in de Perinatale Sterfte. Erasmus MC: University Medical
Center Rotterdam. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/23454
Renfrew, M., McFadden, A., Bastos, M., Campbell, J., Channon, A.,
Cheung, N., Eugene Declercq, E. (2014). Midwifery and quality care:
findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn
care. Lancet, 384(9948), 1129-1145
Homer, C., Friberg, I., Bastos Dias, M., ten Hoope-Bender, P., Sandall,
J., Speciale, A., Bartlett, L. (2014). The project effect of scaling up
midwifery. Lancet, 384 (9948), 1146-1157
Van Lerberghe, W., Matthews, Z., Achadi, E., Ancona, C., Campbell, J.,
Channon, A., Turkmani, S. (2014). Country experience with strengthening
of health systems and development of midwives in countries with high
maternal mortality. Lancet, 384 (9948), 1215-1225
Ten Hoope-Bender, P., de Bernis, L., Campbell, J., Downe, S., Fauveau,
V., Fogstad, H., .Van Lerberghe, W. (2014). Improvement of maternal and
newborn health through midwifery. Lancet, 384 (9948), 1226-1235.
Target AudienceBachelor Midwifery students.
Dr. Caroline Geerts (MD, researcher and lecturer)
Dr. Ank de Jonge (midwife, associated professor)
Dr. Trudy Klomp (midwife, researcher, lecturer and coördinator of the
Dr. Linda Martin (psychologist, lecturer and researcher)
Dr. Corine Verhoeven (midwife PA, researcher, lecturer)
|Language of Tuition||English|
|Faculty||Faculty of Science|
|Course Coordinator||dr. G.M.T. Klomp MSc|
|Examiner||dr. G.M.T. Klomp MSc|
You need to register for this course yourself
Last-minute registration is available for this course.
|Teaching Methods||Study Group, Lecture, Practical|
This course is also available as: