Dit vak wordt in het Engels aangeboden. Omschrijvingen kunnen daardoor mogelijk alleen in het Engels worden weergegeven.
Doel vakAt the end of this course the student is better able
in terms of knowledge.....:
- to identify and address a number of ethical issues at the interface
between neuroscience and society (the topic list gives an impression of
which issues will be discussed)
in terms of skills...:...
- to address and discuss these issues in professional and public
in terms of attitude......:
- to appreciate the responsibilities of the neuroscientist as scientist
in communication with the general public.
Inhoud vakNeuroethics is the field in which the moral, legal, societal and
philosophical implications of brain research are investigated.
Neuroscience has an impact on how we think about ourselves (namely as
free, rational, and autonomous agents). It affects practices like law
and psychiatry. It confronts us with moral concerns about certain
applications: enhancement of normal functioning, mind-reading and
lie-detection, military applications, and far-reaching forms of health
surveillance, just to name a few. On the other hand, neuroscientific
insights can be instrumental in promoting dignity, equal treatment and
protecting rights of people who are ‘diverse’ in some way (for example,
those with mild autism, ADHD, instable mood). Finally, neuroscience
affects our view on human nature. This course investigates the intricate
ramifications in the interaction between neuroscience, society, and our
view on human nature.
Topics to be included are
a. Neuroethics introduction: impact of neuroscience on moral philosophy
b. Neurolaw: impact on the law and on legal practices
(i) Revision of law and legal practices (e.g., adolescent brain
(ii) Assessment of people (e.g., brain-based mind-reading/lie-detection)
(iii) Intervention (e.g., deep brain stimulation and the law)
c. Enhancement (enhancing brain/mind capacities using neuro-technology)
d. Neuroscience and the public image (with a contribution by Brein in
e. Big data and the brain; health surveillance
f. The future (neuro)society – where are we heading to? Opportunities,
challenges, risks; afforded by our increased understanding of
- study of literature
- group discussion
Toetsvorm- Oral summaries + discussions in class (20%)
- Final paper (3000 words) (80%)
The summaries and discussions in the classroom are evaluated on the
basis of the following points:
- Overall quality of summaries (clarity, succinctness, focus)
- Relevance (questions, remarks)
- Presentation (skills, use of digital media, quality of discussion)
The final presentation is assessed on the basis of the following points:
- Clarity of research question/topic
- Clear description of the way the question/topic is methodically
- Relevant, succinct and focused summary of findings and arguments in
- Quality of the argumentation
- Is the conclusion based on the preceding findings and reasoning?
Vereiste voorkennisMeeting of general admission criteria for the program as a whole; no
LiteratuurTo be announced on Canvas
DoelgroepThe course is open for students of the master Philosophy of Neuroscience
and of the research master Neuroscience as well all those who don’t
follow the (entire) program but qualify for a master study. In case of
doubt, ask the coordinator whether you are eligible for the course.
|Faculteit||Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen|
|Vakcoördinator||prof. dr. G. Glas|
|Examinator||prof. dr. G. Glas|
dr. P. Robichaud
prof. dr. G. Glas
Voor dit vak moet je zelf intekenen.
Voor dit vak kun je last-minute intekenen.
Dit vak is ook toegankelijk als: